First up was a Mr Forrester, a farmer from Mull who opined that they now have no larks or lapwings, and only a few curlews. He argued that his land management 'has not changed for 50 years'. (Really? Not one little chemical spray in the toolshed? Are you totally organic and harvest by scythe and shire horse?). The reason he unilaterally declares is...(you guessed it)... raptors! Yes they have white-tailed eagles (those well-known predators of skylarks!), buzzards and ravens, and so it is 'The RSPB's that is to blame, not the farmers. Raptors should be killed as in the past' he declares. Well Mr Forrester I note on Mullbirds Safaris' website that amongst the things they see are 'skylarks, golden plovers, lapwings, hen harriers, curlews, merlins, among many other species'. So everything seems to be getting on fine in other parts of Mull, are you sure its not just you? Maybe its time to check in that toolshed!
He was followed the next day by another couch expertato, a Mr Stewart-Smith of Essex. He whined that they used to have geese, ducks, chickens, and carp in large numbers - free range (the mind boggles at the image of free-range carp!). These are now ALL gone says Mr Stewart-Smith, and it is down to (wait for it)... "...overpopulous sparrowhawks, buzzards, kestrels, and otters. Surely time for some more enlightened fact-based policies?" he asks. Oh indeed it is Mr Stewart-Smith, but more of that later.
Not to be outdone The Daily Telelaugh had two couch expertatoes whining about bat inspections in lofts. A Mr Hobhouse of Worcestershire moaned about an inspection of his 1950 3-bedroom semi-detached house costing £500. (If I were him I would keep quiet because thats cheap, did the ecologist live next door?) Then apparently another ecologist, there to observe as the tiles were removed, announced "No bats will be living in that roof", as she 'got out of her car'! "As we knew all along" added Mr Hobhouse. Wow, an ecologist who can see through every angle of a roof from one spot (what does she have for breakfast, Kryptonite? And would she like to come and work for us?). Wow again, superhero homeowners with senses so highly tuned they know whether a 1 ounce pipistrelle alights on the roof and slips under a tile from downstairs with the telly on, amazing.
Bat-bashing was clearly the order of the day though as a Mr White of London also bemoaned the 'needs of bats taking priority over those of humans and historic buildings'. He urged the Government to 'reign in the activities of the bat-fanciers'. Rather than wail to the Telelaugh he might have considered why such laws about bats exist. It is because they have suffered such dramatic declines (pipistrelles by 70% in the 1980s), exacerbated by new design techniques and renovations of old buildings. In other words because the 'needs' of developers took priority over those of bats. Without protective legislation the extinction of the only mammals ever to evolve powered flight is a distinct possibility.
Thankfully in The misTimes there was also a letter from five scientific societies, arguing that 'Science Investment Is The Key'. I heartily agree and hereby propose a compulsory course in ecology, and that Messrs Forrester, Stewart-Smith, Hobhouse, and White be enrolled in the first cohort. Perhaps they may then indeed develop some 'more enlightened fact-based policies'!